The former couple, who were together from 2011 until 2020 and share two children, spoke out on Monday in response to a story published by The Daily Mail. In the article, a woman who was described as a former nanny for the two stars divulged alleged private details about the time leading up to and around their split. The couple, who were together from 2011 until 2020 and share two children, spoke out in response to the story.
According to a joint statement that the couple gave to CNN, the statement read as follows: “As parents, it is tremendously heartbreaking to learn that a former nanny of our two young children would chose to make such false and scurrilous charges about us publicly.” “Her campaign of tormenting us, as well as loved ones, close friends, and coworkers, which has now been going on for the past 18 months, has unfortunately reached its terrible climax.”
The statement came to a close by saying, “We will continue to focus on raising and protecting our children with the honest hope that she will now choose to leave our family alone.”
The unidentified woman spoke with the British outlet about the couple’s interactions while Wilde was in a relationship with Harry Styles, with whom she was working on the set of her film “Don’t Worry Darling.” The claims made by the woman have not been verified by CNN. The woman spoke about the interactions between the couple.
Florence Pugh and Harry Styles, a musician whom Olivia Wilde is currently seeing, star in the film. Wilde had previously stated in an interview with Vanity Fair that her relationship with Sudeikis, with whom she shares children Daisy, age 5, and Otis, age 8, had terminated a significant amount of time before she began seeing Styles.
During a prior presentation of her most recent film at CinemaCon in Las Vegas, the director of “Booksmart” discussed the fact that she had been served court documents by Sudeikis’s legal team over the custody of their children. She referred to the act as “vicious.”
CNN received information from a source who was familiar with the situation at the time that stated that Sudeikis “had no previous knowledge of the time or place that the envelope would have been delivered” and described the action as “wrong.”